翻訳と辞書 ・ Davis Terrace, Washington ・ Davis Theater ・ Davis Totem ・ Davis Town Meeting House ・ Davis Township ・ Davis Township, Caldwell County, Missouri ・ Davis Township, Fountain County, Indiana ・ Davis Township, Indiana ・ Davis Township, Kittson County, Minnesota ・ Davis Township, Starke County, Indiana ・ Davis Tull ・ Davis Tutt ・ Davis v Alexander ・ Davis v. Ayala ・ Davis v. Bandemer ・ Davis v. Beason ・ Davis v. City of Las Vegas ・ Davis v. Commissioner ・ Davis v. Commissioner (constructive receipt) ・ Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County ・ Davis v. FEC ・ Davis v. Mann ・ Davis v. Massachusetts ・ Davis v. United States ・ Davis v. United States (1990) ・ Davis v. United States (1994) ・ Davis v. United States (2011) ・ Davis v. Washington ・ Davis Valley ・ Davis Wade Stadium
|
|
Davis v. Beason : ウィキペディア英語版 | Davis v. Beason __NOTOC__ ''Davis v. Beason'', 133 U.S. 333 (1890), was a United States Supreme Court case affirming, by a 9-0 vote, that federal laws against polygamy did not conflict with the free exercise clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. ==Background== Congress had passed the Edmunds Act in 1882, which made polygamy a felony; over 1,300 Mormons were imprisoned. The Act also required test oaths requiring voters to swear they were not bigamists or polygamists. A statute of the Idaho Territory required a similar oath, in order to limit or eliminate Mormons' participation in government and their control of local schools.〔''American Cultural Pluralism and Law''; Jill Norgren, Serena Nanda; p. 91-92; Greenwood Publishing Group, 2006; fetched from (the version on Google Book Search ) on 18 March 2009.〕 Mormons initiated a challenge to Idaho's oath test. Davis, a resident of Idaho, was convicted in the territorial district court of swearing falsely after taking the voter's oath.〔("Davis v. Beason (1890)" ), fetched 18 March 2009.〕〔("Davis v. Beason 130 U.S. 333 (1890)" ), Richard E. Morgan, 1986. Macmillan Reference USA. Fetched 18 March 2009.〕 Davis appealed his conviction via a ''habeas corpus'' writ, claiming that the Idaho law requiring the oath violated his right to the free exercise of his religion as a member of the LDS Church.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Davis v. Beason」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|